Re: Gravity (traditional ideas, and RM)
by nameta9 » Wed Dec 18, 2013 9:07 am
"The reason for this attraction is not understood in traditional physics,"
The reason for X is not understood in traditional physics,
The reason for X is not understood in Y,
No matter how perfect Y is, no matter how many different and improved Ys there are, you will always find some X that cannot be "understood" in Y or in anything at all as the very idea of "understood" is vague, can mean so many different things, is subjective, etc. Anything can be declared understood well enough or not at all depending on the subjective measurements and expectations the Processing Subject is Executing...
And there is no end to the possible inventions of new Ys and Xs and so forth...
ted
The reason for X is not understood in traditional physics,
The reason for X is not understood in Y,
No matter how perfect Y is, no matter how many different and improved Ys there are, you will always find some X that cannot be "understood" in Y or in anything at all as the very idea of "understood" is vague, can mean so many different things, is subjective, etc. Anything can be declared understood well enough or not at all depending on the subjective measurements and expectations the Processing Subject is Executing...
And there is no end to the possible inventions of new Ys and Xs and so forth...
ted
No comments:
Post a Comment